Clive Owen I found
fell perfectly into the role, very, very good ... finally believable! (Last roles was just ridiculous).
film in some ways reminded me of Kramer vs. Kramer, the recovery of the father-son relationship is well defined and realistic. There are no kissing or hugging out of place (I mean the eldest son), but only affinity and complicity in the desires and lifestyle. The contrast between the college English Australia is wild and the metaphor of a relationship (that between parent and child) that can be free and instinctive (Joe) or dictated by rules and precepts relating to the appearance than the substance. The eldest son will choose the love of the father because the free and spontaneous. Despite living "like a pig" and proves once more the unconscious side of the typical male parental irresponsibility that Harry will pay dearly.
I really liked the first part, the choice to show the agony of his wife, I found it unnecessary and painfully free. Instead, the apparitions of the wife liked me, are questions to which Joe looks for answers, it really is not his wife to answer but is himself to make decisions, supported by memories of the woman he loves. Appearances of real talk about it only once (her mother) but there are shown. And I liked the choice to see what is possible (the memory of a missing person who helps to live) and not to show off what is useless (visions related to the pain of a loss).
In any case, a film that unfolds mostly in the dialogue between Joe and Harry in the pub, the importance of fathers and the trend generally have a bit 'all into thinking that a child has little need of a mother and a father. Big, big mistake.
film in some ways reminded me of Kramer vs. Kramer, the recovery of the father-son relationship is well defined and realistic. There are no kissing or hugging out of place (I mean the eldest son), but only affinity and complicity in the desires and lifestyle. The contrast between the college English Australia is wild and the metaphor of a relationship (that between parent and child) that can be free and instinctive (Joe) or dictated by rules and precepts relating to the appearance than the substance. The eldest son will choose the love of the father because the free and spontaneous. Despite living "like a pig" and proves once more the unconscious side of the typical male parental irresponsibility that Harry will pay dearly.
I really liked the first part, the choice to show the agony of his wife, I found it unnecessary and painfully free. Instead, the apparitions of the wife liked me, are questions to which Joe looks for answers, it really is not his wife to answer but is himself to make decisions, supported by memories of the woman he loves. Appearances of real talk about it only once (her mother) but there are shown. And I liked the choice to see what is possible (the memory of a missing person who helps to live) and not to show off what is useless (visions related to the pain of a loss).
In any case, a film that unfolds mostly in the dialogue between Joe and Harry in the pub, the importance of fathers and the trend generally have a bit 'all into thinking that a child has little need of a mother and a father. Big, big mistake.
7.5/10
0 comments:
Post a Comment