(Adnkronos) - Zero tolerance against repeat offenders of illegal immigrants who continue to remain in the territory despite a deportation order already given 'in advance by the Commissioner. The hard line comes from the Supreme Court that, unlike previous rulings in which he had shown more 'tolerance for repeat offenders of illegal immigrants claiming they could not be rearrested, now emphasizes that, who is talking "without just cause "in our country, is not entitled to extenuating circumstances, and even if 'clean record. The spirit of the law that has converted the' security decree ', in fact, excludes" the indiscriminate use of the benefits reserved only for specific situations and however, "more 'restricted than those previously authorized them.
is why' the First Criminal Chamber (Case 8635) upheld the appeal of the Prosecutor of Ancona which had opposed the granting of extenuating circumstances granted by the Court of Urbino to a clandestine 30 year old Nigerian, Ndubuisi N. Okey, although for the second time he disobeyed the order of the superintendent of leaving the territory. According to the Supreme Court, which annulled without reference court's decision in July, to grant a mitigating illegal on the basis of his incesuratezza and 'contrary to the provisions of Law 125 came into force last July 26.
In fact, records Piazza Cavour, the deportation order had been given to Nigeria by the Quaestor of Urbino on June 25, 2008 but a month after the clandestine Lunano was surprised again. HOWEVER, the court of Urbino, July 29, 2008, the date the immigrant incensuratezza had granted extenuating circumstances, sentencing him to death, suspended on probation, 5 months and 10 days imprisonment. Hence the appeal brought by the Prosecutor of Ancona.
The Supreme Court upheld the appeal of the Prosecutor, highlighting how the law of conversion of 'security decree', he wanted to exclude that the mere absence of criminal history can be a basis for the granting of extenuating circumstances. " In fact, still has the Supreme Court, "all the provisions are aimed to restore effectiveness 'to the penalty preventing the indiscriminate use of benefits that the legislature intended to restrict to specific situations, more' restricted than those previously authorized them ". The recidivist illegal, therefore, must 'serve eight months in prison "without extenuating circumstances."
